Abstract
The term “postmodernism” can refer to many different things
ranging from art to politics. Postmodernism also has connotations
with philosophical and social movements. The concentration of this
essay is to examine the social sphere of the philosophical notion of
postmodernism. It is, then, to say that the philosophical and social
distributions of postmodernism are intimately connected. The first
part of this essay will examine the precursor to postmodernism,
“modernism”, as well as some of the movement’s weaknesses or
shortcomings. The following will also address some of the social
effects of interrogating meta- and personal influences. This essay
asserts that we as a society and as individual persons are not, nor
can we be, prepared for the “discursive construction” that
embodies the heart of postmodernism. In fact, it may well be in our
best interest not to be. A case will also be made against
postmodernism and how it has been enacted within the world.
Furthermore, I postulate that we exist within a unique state of
trauma, perhaps post-trauma, in which our memories, narratives, and
confidants are called into question from every angle. Nevertheless,
The World and our worlds have not stopped or been enacted upon
retroactively. Rather, we continue working, living, and being in a
nameless age; a narrative with an innumerable amount of blank pages
left to fill. So, it would seem, that somewhere between catharsis
and oblivion, at the intersection of nowhere and everything, it is
very probable that something quite therapeutic occurs.
No comments:
Post a Comment